Bringing Toribash Community In-Game: Forum as a Social Hub
Main Idea:
Transform the official Toribash forum into an integrated feature within the game’s UI, functioning as an
in-game social network to strengthen the community and boost engagement.
🔹 Current Problem- The forum is active but remains disconnected from the main gameplay experience.
- New players often miss out on the forum, losing access to tutorials, tournaments, and community interaction.
- Veteran players concentrate on the forum, creating a gap between them and newcomers.
🔹 Proposed Solution
Integrate the forum directly into the Toribash client, designed with social network-inspired elements.
Suggested Features:- In-Game Feed
- Recent forum posts (news, clans, mods, tournaments).
- Quick actions: like, comment, and share directly from the UI.
- Integrated Profiles
- Game stats + forum activity history.
- In-game notifications for mentions, replies, and clan invites.
- Clan & Content Spaces
- Mini timelines for clans.
- Spotlight for mods, replays, and player-created videos.
- Gamification
- Badges, achievements, and cosmetic rewards tied to forum activity.
- Social ranking alongside competitive ranking.
🔹 Expected Benefits- Increased engagement: players interact more with the community without leaving the game.
- Social integration: bridges the gap between newcomers and veterans.
- Community-driven content visibility: mods, tutorials, and tournaments gain more exposure.
- Player retention: Toribash becomes not just a game, but a unique social ecosystem.
🔹 Competitive Edge
Very few sandbox fighting games provide a
built-in social platform. This innovation would position Toribash not only as a game but as a
community hub, making it stand out in the genre.
Maintaining two completely separate trading systems — one web-based (written in PHP) and another as part of the game server (written in C++) — would be very complicated. Each would have its own specific problems and both would need to stay in sync whenever changes are made. Here are the main points:
⚙️ Technical Difficulties
1. **Data Synchronization**
- Every time an item is traded or updated, both systems would need to update at the same time.
- This creates risk of inconsistencies (e.g., an item disappearing on one side but not the other).
2. **Maintaining Two Codebases**
- Different bugs in each system.
- Fixes and updates would need to be implemented twice.
3. **Performance & Scalability**
- The C++ system must handle real-time gameplay, while PHP works with asynchronous requests.
- Keeping both in parallel would require a bridge/API to constantly communicate, increasing latency and risk of failures.
4. **Security**
- Two systems = two attack surfaces.
- Exploits could appear if one side is more vulnerable than the other.
🔹 Possible Solutions
1. **Centralize Logic in One System**
- Create a unified API (REST or gRPC) used by both the game and the website.
- The backend handles all trading logic; clients just display and consume data.
2. **Synchronization Layer**
- Use a single central database (e.g., PostgreSQL/MySQL + Redis cache), ensuring both game and website only make requests without keeping their own separate logic.
3. **Modernization**
- Migrate the PHP system to something more modern (Node.js, Go, etc.) or wrap it into microservices that communicate with the C++ server.
✅ **Summary:**
Yes, it would be very difficult and expensive to maintain two separate systems. The ideal solution is to unify trading logic into a single backend that both the web and the game client use. This reduces maintenance, bugs, and security issues.
---
💰 **Estimated Cost of Such a Change**
Of course, this depends heavily on the team, scope, and available time. A realistic estimate:
1. **API Planning & Design** – 2 to 4 weeks
- Define endpoints, authentication, and data flow.
- Cost: **$5k – $15k**
2. **Backend Implementation (Unified API)** – 1 to 2 months
- Development in Node.js, Go, or C++ (more expensive).
- Integration with central database.
- Cost: **$20k – $50k**
3. **Game Client Adaptation (C++)** – 3 to 6 weeks
- Replace internal trading logic with API calls.
- Tests to prevent exploits.
- Cost: **$10k – $25k**
4. **Website Adaptation (PHP)** – 2 to 4 weeks
- Refactor to consume the unified API instead of maintaining separate logic.
- Cost: **$5k – $15k**
5. **Testing, QA & Security** – 4 to 6 weeks
- Load tests, exploit prevention, data sync validation.
- Cost: **$10k – $30k**
---
📊 **Total Estimated Cost:**
- **Minimum (lean): ~$50k**
- **Maximum (full/professional): ~$135k**
💡 **Required team:**
- 1 backend developer
- 1 C++ developer
- 1 web developer
- 1 QA/tester
- Possibly 1 devops engineer for infrastructure
Note: I’m not a developer myself.
This idea and technical breakdown were built together with ChatGPT to better structure the concept before sharing it here with the community and developers.
Last edited by Gabriel; Sep 2, 2025 at 05:24 PM.